GAMT寫作有着七宗罪，你們知道是什麼嗎?下面是小編爲大家整理收集的關於gmat寫作七宗罪的相關解析，希望對大家有所幫助。
一、什麼是gmat寫作七宗罪
gmat寫作的七宗罪是指gmat駁論文Argument題目中存在的邏輯漏洞或錯誤，考生根據考試中常見的邏輯漏洞和考察方向把其總結爲“七宗罪”，既形象又方便參加gmat考試備考的考生進行背誦。考生在備考時可以按照七宗罪中的邏輯錯誤類型進行有目的的查找，一方面節省了考試時間，另一方面確保找到的邏輯錯誤的準確，這對於拿到gmat寫作高分很有幫助!
二、gmat寫作七宗罪包括哪些內容
第一宗罪：無因果聯繫，是指作者給出的解釋和得出的結論沒有因果上的聯繫，或者是二者毫不相關。
The author commits a fallacy of causal oversimplification. The line of the reasoning is that because A occurred before B, the former event is responsible for the latter. But this is fallacious reasoning unless other possible causal explanations have been considered and ruled out. For example, perhaps C is the cause of these events or perhaps B is caused by D.
第二宗罪：樣本不足，是指給出的論據或例子不充分，不足以說明某個問題，不能支撐作者得出這樣的結論。
The evidence the author provides is insufficient to support the conclusion drawn from it. One example is logically unsounded to establish a general conclusion, unless it can be shown that A1 is representative of all A. It is possible that.... In fact, in face of such limited evidence, the conclusion that B is completely unwarranted.
第三宗罪: 錯誤類比，即把毫不相關的兩個事物拿來作比較，並由此得出一些結論。
The argument rests on the assumption that A is analogous to B in all respects. This assumption is weak, since although there are points of comparison between A and B, there is much dissimilarity as well. For example, A..., however, B.... Thus, it is likely much more difficult for B to do....
第四宗罪：時地全等，主要是指沒有用發展的觀點看待問題，拿過去的事例和現在的作對比，並由此得出結論。
The author commits the fallacy of “all things are equal”. The fact that happened two years ago is not a sound evidence to draw a conclusion that.... The author assumes without justification that the background conditions have remained the same at different times or at different locations. However, it is not clear in this argument whether the current conditions at AA are the same as they used to be two years ago. Thus it is impossible to conclude that..
第五宗罪：二者擇一，即限制了結論的範圍，按照非此即彼的觀點得出結論。
The author assumes that AA and BB are mutually exclusive alternatives and there is no room for a middle ground. However, the author provides no reason for imposing an either-or choice. Common sense tells us that adjusting both AA and BB might produce better results.
第六宗罪：可疑調查，指作者提供的證據是片面的或者是有限的，不能保證結論的順利推出。
The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative. The claim does not indicate who conducted the poll, who responded, or when, where and how the poll was conducted. Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.
第七宗罪：結論無據，指得出的結論是毫無根據的，或者是前面的假設是不能成立的。
The author falsely depends on gratuitous assumption that.... However, no evidence is stated in the argument to support this assumption. In fact, this is not necessarily the case. For example, it is more likely that.... Therefore, this argument is unwarranted without ruling out such possibility。
三、如何避過七宗罪
1、明確gmat寫作思路
gmat argument寫作側重的是考生對題乾的理解和分析能力，而非是對某一問題的看法或瞭解程度，所以考生在備考之初要明確的寫作目的，然後找到思路拓展的方向，這樣纔能有重點的進行方法的學習。
在gmat寫作中，如果考生無法全面的表達自己的觀點或者看法，是不能取得滿意的分數的。在進行gmat寫作之前，先問自己一個問題：“接下來該怎麼寫?這些內容會對我的主題有什麼幫助?這個點爲什麼重要?”這幾個問題直接關係着文章的思路和行文佈局，考生想明白這幾個問題就能輕鬆確定文章思路，把控好文章的結構和方向。在練習的時候，請注意觀點之間的銜接，不要讓它被孤立，並且要注意觀點或論點前後的銜接。
2、掌握gmat寫作七宗罪，論證有力
gmat寫作 Argument邏輯錯誤可以分爲7種，分別是無因果聯繫、樣本不足、錯誤類比、時地全等、二者擇一、可疑調查以及結論無據等，考生在備考時可以按照七宗罪中的邏輯錯誤類型，有針對性的掌握應對方法，更有利於避過七宗罪!