As the dominant discourse would have it, the economic world is a pure and perfect order, implacably unrolling the logic of its predictable consequences, and prompt to repress all violations by the sanctions that it inflicts, either automatically or - more unusually - through the intermediary of its armed extensions, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the policies they impose: reducing labour costs, reducing public expenditures and making work more flexible. Is the dominant discourse right? What if, in reality, this economic order were no more than the implementation of a utopia - the utopia of neoliberalism - thus converted into a political problem? One that, with the aid of the economic theory that it proclaims, succeeds in conceiving of itself as the scientific description of reality?
This tutelary theory is a pure mathematical fiction. From the start it has been founded on a formidable abstraction. For, in the name of a narrow and strict conception of rationality as individual rationality, it brackets the economic and social conditions of rational orientations and the economic and social structures that are the condition of their application.
To give the measure of this omission, it is enough to think just of the educational system. Education is never taken account of as such at a time when it plays a determining role in the production of goods and services as in the production of the producers themselves. From this sort of original sin, inscribed in the Walrasian myth (1) of "pure theory", flow all of the deficiencies and faults of the discipline of economics and the fatal obstinacy with which it attaches itself to the arbitrary opposition which it induces, through its mere existence, between a properly economic logic, based on competition and efficiency, and social logic, which is subject to the rule of fairness.
That said, this "theory" that is desocialised and dehistoricised at its roots has, today more than ever, the means of making itself true and empirically verifiable. In effect, neoliberal discourse is not just one discourse among many. Rather, it is a "strong discourse" - the way psychiatric discourse is in an asylum, in Erving Goffman's analysis (2). It is so strong and so hard to combat only because it has on its side all of the forces of a world of relations of forces, a world that it contributes to making what it is. It does this most notably by orienting the economic choices of those who dominate economic relationships. It thus adds its own symbolic force to these relations of forces. In the name of this scientific programme, converted into a plan of political action, an immense political project
The essence of neoliberalism
學識都
人氣:2.68W
最新文章
- 1Take Care of the Interviewers
- 2The Structure of an Interview
- 3Profiles of the Chinese Pig Industry
- 4Discussion about the Mechanism of C
- 5Civil engineers of the cover letter
- 6Statement on the Articles of Impeachment
- 7The factory director of English resume
- 8Cover letter the Department of Medicine
- 9The Name of a Poet
- 10the important of a second language
- 11One Side of the Case
- 12The cost of marriage笑話
- 13The Eight Types of Interview Questions
- 14For the League of Nations
- 15Impulsive Control of the Passive co
欄目推薦
- 1Containerisation in the ports of Vietnam
- 2The Seven Cs of Business Letter Writing
- 3Biographical notes on the preservation of equipment
- 4Great Depressions of the 20th Centu
- 5The design of soft Van CV
- 6Human resources director of the resume
- 7The Design of USB Video Device
- 8The Translation of English Idioms and Proverbs
- 9Profiles of the Chinese Pig Industr
- 10The Colors of the Rainbow考研英語作文
- 11觀後感:Front of the Class
- 12The Power of a Good Cover Letter
- 13The structure of Chinese Letter Writing
- 14Art Paper The Chain Of Art
- 15Brainstorming as Part of the Negotiation