11月6日的GRE考試已經過去了，但是裏面的閱讀是怎麼樣的呢?下面是小編爲大家整理收集的關於11月6日GRE考後閱讀邏輯真題的相關詳情，希望對大家有所幫助。
長閱讀
In February 1848 the people of Paris rose in revolt against the constitutional monarchy of Louis-Philippe. Despite the existence of excellent narrative accounts, the February Days, as this revolt is called, have been largely ignored by social historians of the past two decades. For each of the three other major insurrections in nineteenth-century Paris—July 1830, June 1848, and May 1871—there exists at least a sketch of participants’ backgrounds and an analysis, more or less rigorous, of the reasons for the occurrence of the uprisings. Only in the case of the February Revolution do we lack a useful description of participants that might characterize it in the light of what social history has taught us about the process of revolutionary mobilization.
Two reasons for this relative neglect seem obvious. First, the insurrection of February has been overshadowed by that of June. The February Revolution overthrew a regime, to be sure, but met with so little resistance that it failed to generate any real sense of historical drama. Its successor, on the other hand, appeared to pit key socioeconomic groups in a life-or-death struggle and was widely seen by contemporary observers as marking a historical departure. Through their interpretations, which exert a continuing influence on our understanding of the revolutionary process, the impact of the events of June has been magnified, while, as an unintended consequence, the significance of the February insurrection has been diminished. Second, like other “successful” insurrections, the events of February failed to generate the most desirable kinds of historical records. Although the June insurrection of 1848 and the Paris Commune of 1871 would be considered watersheds of nineteenth-century French history by any standard, they also present the social historian with a signal advantage: these failed insurrections created a mass of invaluable documentation as a by-product of authorities’ efforts to search out and punish the rebels.
Quite different is the outcome of successful insurrections like those of July 1830 and February 1848. Experiences are retold, but participants typically resume their daily routines without ever recording their activities. Those who played salient roles may become the objects of highly embellished verbal accounts or in rare cases, of celebratory articles in contemporary periodicals. And it is true that the publicly acknowledged leaders of an uprising frequently write memoirs. However, such documents are likely to be highly unreliable, unrepresentative, and unsystematically preserved, especially when compared to the detailed judicial dossiers prepared for everyone arrested following a failed insurrection. As a consequence, it may prove difficult or impossible to establish for a successful revolution a comprehensive and trustworthy picture of those who participated, or to answer even the most basic questions one might pose concerning the social origins of the insurgents.
1. It can be inferred from the passage that support for the objectives of the February Revolution was
A. negligible
B. misguided
C. fanatical
D. spontaneous
E. widespread
答案：E
2. Which of the following, best describes the organization of the second paragraph?
A. The thesis of the passage is stated and supporting evidence systematically presented.
B. Two views regarding the thesis presented in the first paragraph are compared and contrasted.
C. Evidence refuting the thesis presented in the first paragraph is systematically presented.
D. The thesis presented in the first paragraph is systematically supported.
E. The thesis presented in the first paragraph is further defined and a conclusion drawn.
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author considers which of the following essential for understanding a revolutionary mobilization?
A. A comprehensive theory of revolution that can be applied to the major insurrections of the nineteenth century
B. Awareness of the events necessary for a revolution to be successful
C. Access to narratives and memoirs written by eyewitnesses of a given revolution
D. The historical perspective provided by the passage of a considerable amount of time
E. Knowledge of the socioeconomic backgrounds of a revolution’s participants
答案：D
4. Which of the following can be inferred about the “detailed judicial dossiers” referred to in line 49?
A. Information contained in the dossiers sheds light on the social origins of a revolution’s participants.
B. The dossiers closely resemble the narratives written by the revolution’s leaders in their personal memoirs.
C. The information that such dossiers contain is untrustworthy and unrepresentative of a revolution’s participants.
D. Social historians prefer to avoid such dossiers whenever possible because they are excessively detailed.
E. The February Revolution of 1848 produced more of these dossiers than did the June insurrection.
答案：A
邏輯閱讀
1. 作者基於一個試驗數據得出假設：看暴力電視節目多的孩子們會比不怎麼看的孩子更容易表現出暴力傾向。
題目：作者的假設會被以下哪個情況推翻
參考答案：該試驗裏看暴力節目多的小孩在其他場景下並沒表現出暴力傾向。
2. 結論：一種鳥會發出多種聲調的歌聲(製造不止自己一個的假象)，靠這種歌聲可以防止競爭者來搶奪它的挺低。
題目：作者得出這種結論的假設是什麼
短閱讀
red maple在某地區有一個大的增長，相對來說溫度升高，二氧化碳增多帶來的光合作用對這樹的增長貢獻不是很大，可能有的其他原因是森林裏放火，鹿，oak等因素。
題目：本文主要講了什麼?
參考答案：討論了該地區maple增多的幾個可能原因
題目：作者爲什麼提到光合作用?
參考答案：說明二氧化碳增多對樹木增多貢獻不大。
某個作家對後來美國黑人女作家的強大影響力。儘管後來的黑人女作家已經很擯棄mainstream了，但還是潛在受到某個作家的影響。
題目：作者對某作家的態度。