e have been attempts to explain these taboos in terms ofinappropriate social relationships either between those who areinvolved and those who are not simultaneously involved in thesatisfaction of a bodily need，or between those already satiatedand those who appear to be shamelessly gorging.
人們試圖對這些禁忌作出解釋，所依據的要麼是那些正置身於某一身體需要滿足的人與那些並置身於某一身體需要之滿足的人之間的，要麼是那些早已酒足飯飽的人與那些正在不知羞恥地狼吞虎嚥失之間的不相稱的社會關係。
critics of Family Brontes novel Wuthering Heights see itssecond part as a counterpoint that comments on，if it does notreverse，the first part，where a romantic reading receives moreconfirmation.
研究艾米麗勃朗特小說《呼嘯山莊》的`許多文學評論家，將小說的第二部分視作一種對比物，即使沒有將第一部分予以逆轉的話，也是在對第一部分作出一種詮釋評判，而在小說第一部分中，一種浪漫的的讀解能獲得更爲充分的確證。
ted that the presence of these elements need not arguean authorial awareness of novelistic construction comparable to that ofHenry James，their presence does encourage attempts to unify thenovels heterogeneous parts.
誠然，這些因素的存在並不能證明作者對小說架構的意識可與亨利詹姆斯的那種意識相比擬;然則，任何力圖將小說所有形形色色的因素統一起來的做法，在某種程度上註定是無法令人信服的。